David Cameron Walker

Archive for the ‘Barnet’ Category

Barnet’s season as “The glass of Fashion and the Mould of form”

Saturday, March 3rd, 2012

Something is Rotten at the Home of Football.

For fans of Barnet FC this has been a season, so far, of extremes. Since the beginning of the season we have seen the club vie for the bottom of the Football League with Plymouth Argyle, beat two teams from League One, go unbeaten in November and January, lose their last four games – conceding 12 and scoring 3 – win four games in a row for the first time since 2009, oh and come as close as they ever have in my living memory for a shot at a cup final at Wembley, before losing to Swindon.

Attempting to contextualise the in-exhaustive list of triumph and tragedy above, in order to rationalise, explain and understand the season so far is imperative. As such, viewing Barnet FC’s season, and judging it’s trajectory as Prince Hamlet of Denmark offers the perfect framework to judge the season so far and to offer potential insight as to how the season will end.

‘To be or not to be, that is the question’ - Act III, Scene I

Perhaps the most definitive and widely known characteristic of Hamlet is his indecision. Indeed it could be described as his most tragic flaw. It is also something which Barnet have displayed throughout the season, with similarly paralyzing results. Consider that Barnet’s recent poor performances have come hot on the heels of their season’s best string of results, which had the effect of moving the team closer to the play-offs than the relegation zone. It seems abundantly clear that this posed a question which has not been addressed; namely how do the team approach games now that promotion, not relegation is the immediate concern?

Unsure as to how to proceed in games, when to pressurise opposition and how to respond to teams who treat them with respect as opposed to a struggling side who stop playing football when they fall behind, the team’s performances and results have suffered as a direct consequence.

Nowhere was this more evident than in the recent home game against Shrewsbury, when a fine first half performance was undone by an injury time own goal, which led to one of the worst second half performances I have ever had the misfortune to pay to see. It was clear to see that the team could not decide how to approach the defect – whether maintaining their first half tactics or adopting a more direct approach would be more effective. The result was a clear symptom of the kind of indecision which has plagued Barnet’s decision making recently.

A lack of consistency in performances, form and results have led to a situation whereby Barnet appear to be, much like our tragic hero Hamlet, incapacitated by indecision, when an approach promoting continuity in thinking would have been more beneficial.

‘O, what a rogue and peasant slave am I- Act II, Scene II

A consequence of Hamlets indecision is his guilt over his inaction, which serves to make him only more angry, introspective and impotent, clouding his judgment and actions further. Equally, Barnet have allowed their guilt, also stemming from their indecisiveness, to further impede their performances, resulting in a vicious circle of indecision, frustration, and further clouded judgement. This is best encapsulated by looking at Barnet’s recent 0-4 implosion at home against Bradford.

An early, reckless, red card and goal conceded proceeded to devolve into a shambolic ‘performance’ with two of the side’s most important and talented players, Michael Hector and Izale McLeod, having to be separated by their own teammates after squaring up to one another. Some might call this ‘showing passion’, but I would suggest that their actions were products of rage and guilt, not of an abstract notion of passion. For me this is of the utmost concern, because unless the vicious circle above is broken I would expect incidents and performances such as these to become more common.

‘…Am I then revenged,
To take him in the purging of his soul,
When he is fit and season’d for his passage?
No!’ –   Act III, Scene III

Throughout the play Hamlet attempts to reconcile his inner turmoil resulting from conflicting motivations. He wants to kill Claudius, and wants to damn his soul to hell; his desire to avenge his father’s murder is contrasted to his personal ambition to become king himself, as well as his much speculated Oedipus complex.

Much like Hamlet, Barnet have struggled with reconciling multiple motivations, from staving off relegation, to attempting an abortive surge to the playoff places, to reaching the final of the Johnstone’s Paint Trophy final at Wembley. It should have come as no surprise that Barnet lacked not only the depth of squad to play so many games in such a relatively short space of time and to get produce good performances and results from all (the Bees played eight games in February) but the motivation of appearing at a cup final at Wembley and then falling at the last hurdle has, in my opinion, had a significant and detrimental effect upon the team.
Not only is this borne out by results since that loss to Swindon (drawn one, lost four, won zero) but has seemingly damaged players motivations, be this conscious or subconscious. After all, how can a trip to Home Park compare to a showcase final? Much like Hamlet missing opportune times to kill his duplicitous Uncle, Barnet have missed a great opportunity to use their cup run as a springboard to a consistent run of results in the league.

Whilst this recent malaise is understandable, it is certainly not acceptable. Barnet have to make sure that their motivations are aligned, and consistent. This begins with aiming to pick up points to arrest their worrying run of form, not spending time fuelling anger, guilt and indecision.

‘Thus conscience does make cowards of us all;
And thus the native hue of resolution
Is sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought;
And enterprises of great pith and moment,
With this regard, their currents turn awry,
And lose the name of action.’ - Act III Scene I

Sadly for the Prince of Denmark, he only embarked upon a course of action after people began to die; indeed he is the final casualty of the tragedy. This should serve as a warning to Barnet FC, that not addressing the team’s character flaws could well result in tragedy for the club and its fans. Only time will tell if Barnet’s season will finish as the play, or as the ending of that charming Hamlet homage ‘The Lion King.’ The first step is surely recognizing that they need to decide how best to play and get points consistently, rather than react to things now outside of their control.

Written by Hugh Webster, We Are Going Up’s Barnet Blogger

Hugh tweets at @hughwebster

Home is where the heart is

Friday, December 23rd, 2011

With the dust having settled from the news that Barnet Football Club will not be be playing their football next season at Underhill Stadium, their home of 104 years, it feels like an appropriate time to revisit the history of the dispute between the club and council so far, and to offer some opinions on a matter which has dragged on for almost as long as I can remember supporting the team.

The background to the situation Barnet now find themselves in is lengthy, complicated, and has been covered in some depth, and in a far more impartial manor than I could hope to achieve in a fantastic article by Ian King over at twohundredpercent.net.

Allied to that the Barnet Football Club Supporters Association conducted an interview with Barnet chairman Tony Kleanthous during the 2009-10 season, which provides a full and frank assessment from his perspective.

This leaves many uncomfortable questions for Barnet supporters, the most pertinent of which are:

- Where will Barnet play next season if not at the Underhill?
- Will Barnet still be able to base themselves in the Borough?

The club do not, as of yet, have any concrete plans for where to play their football next season. In an ideal world this would have been set in stone long before now, but the problems this causes have become exponentially more acute. Indeed Barnet’s medium to long term future is put into question, because without the regular income and identity that a home ground provides, it is not immediately clear how the club could meet it’s existing liabilities, or continue attracting fans beyond it’s relatively small core.

This is why I feel that the answer to the second question is even more crucial than the first. Were Barnet to move beyond it’s historical roots the integrity and soul of the club would be thrown into question. By this I mean that Barnet Football Club have a definite character, from their strip, to location, to legendary sloped pitch. If too much of this mix is altered, as seen with the MK Dons, this can have a devastating impact upon a clubs fan base.

I should state now that I adore the Underhill, with all of it’s faults and foibles, and have many, many cherished memories of the ground, from being a mascot on my tenth birthday, to being promoted from the Football Conference. In a perfect scenario Barnet would be able to redevelop the ground rather than search for a new home. This is clearly not feasible. With this knowledge I fully support Barnet moving ground, and have done so for years, albeit with one proviso. They MUST stay within the Borough.

Until the two questions posed above are answered the club and its fans are stuck in limbo, with no home, and with a great deal of uncertainty hanging over them. I do not doubt the sincerity or motives of the club, and there are potential sites available for development, from the much mooted and dissected Copthall Stadium, to the potential for a ground to be built by Barnet’s state of the art ‘Beehive’ training facility.

In conclusion, the best Christmas present that a Barnet fan could receive this year would be some answers to some pretty fundamental questions about the future of our club. Ignorance is certainly not bliss.

Written by Hugh Webster – We Are Going Up’s Barnet Blogger

Hugh tweets at @hughwebster

Great Expectations and Schrödinger’s Cat

Wednesday, November 2nd, 2011

It would be fair to say I hadn’t expected this – Barnet sat 23rd in the League Two table. I had prepared myself for a relatively uneventful season of point accumulation punctuated by the occasional loss (away from home, of course) ending up with a comfortable mid-table finish. Why has the reality been so different?

As any fan knows, form, injuries and no little amount of luck all play their part in strong starts to the season, but I feel that there are three specific reasons (beyond playing worse than the opponents) as to why pre-season predictions for Barnet were so inaccurate, and why the Bees have had such a poor season so far.

The first reason is one which resonates with many fans of football league clubs and it is the problem of assessing a potential football season with no observation or measurement, but with hope and emotion. This problem is most elegantly explained through the paradox of Schrödinger’s cat.

In 1935 Erwin Schrodinger proposed an experiment where a cat is placed in a box with a sealed vial of poison that will break open at a random time. Since nobody knows if or when the poison has been released, until the box is opened, the cat can be thought as both alive and dead.

In the same way, there was no way of knowing whether Barnet’s season would match my expectations, best them, or (as if turns out) bear no relation, except by lifting open the box, and watching the season unfold before our eyes.

The box is now open on Barnet’s season and it is abundantly clear that, as the league table demonstrates, Barnet have not improved enough relative to other teams in the League.

Barnet have some quality players, such as striker Izale McLeod, but the squad is small and because of the nature and size of the club, there is little or no money to strengthen through the transfer market. When the manager, Lawrie Sanchez states that: “That defending isn’t good enough for League Two. I can’t find two in the centre-half positions that work. New players need to be brought in” that would mean not only finding money for their wages, but identifying targets then hoping they fit in and play well. As the Schrödinger’s cat paradox exemplifies, this is a potential risk the club cannot afford to take.

Barnet are not burdened by an excess of wealth, and the club’s best chance of building a competitive team is through the club’s ‘Beehive’ academy. Realistically this will take many years. It is also clear that Barnet don’t have the resources or squad to compete, relative to other teams in the League, on a week-in week-out basis. Three victories and ten defeats clearly exemplifies this.

The final point regarding Barnet’s start to the season is one of mentality. The most appropriate description of Barnet this season comes from the knowledgeable Kristoffer Hylland who used the term ‘naive.’

Nothing better describes Barnet when they concede a goal and are loosing. Heads drop (literally and metaphorically) and any semblance of working the ball around the pitch, exploiting space and movement, are lost in the rush to find a route one or long ball solution to their deficit. As a fan, this is incredibly frustrating to watch as it is usually ineffective in providing a goal and leads to the team losing possession frequently and needlessly.

The team appear to be allowing previous results and performances to dictate how they respond to current adversity, and this is where we must conclude by learning the lessons of Schrödinger’s cat.

The paradox applies not just to pre-season predictions, but to each of Barnet’s matches so far. The sixteen games the Bees have played should not be taken as a sixteen game streak with themes running through them (except from the context of the League table!) but as sixteen specific individual events, with a win or loss one week not making a particular result the next any more likely.

Intangibles such as ‘form’ as well as winning and losing streaks are added retrospectively and have no bearing on each specific 90 minute game. If Barnet were to recognise that the game is neither won or lost until the final whistle, and that conceding six goals in a previous game previously is superfluous in terms of the next 90 minute event, don’t expect results to improve.

Written by Hugh Webster – We Are Going Up’s Barnet Blogger

Hugh tweets at @hughwebster

Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose?

Thursday, September 15th, 2011

“The more things change, the more they remain the same”

So here we are – eight games into the season and nine points to show for it. But is this a good start to the season? Or does this represent a missed opportunity?

I will talk you through my thinking as to why I consider Barnet’s start to the season to have been a start worth celebrating.

The Good:

Why do I think that these first eight games are a cause for celebration? A cursory glance at the League Two table from the same point last season will reveal some genuine progress.

We have a goal difference which is seven goals better, and a point total which is three more than at the same stage last season. Both of these are encouraging, but I would argue that the most telling difference from Barnet’s previous start to the season is league position. Not only are Barnet not in the relegation zone (!) they are a full four league places and four points clear of 23rd place.

I sincerely believe that if Barnet can avoid the déjà vu of dropping into the relegation zone early in the season – and with it the added pressure and stress – they can avoid it entirely.

Barnet’s victory over Morecambe and draw against Rotherham (currently first and second in the table respectively) demonstrates that the Underhill outfit are capable of competing with the best that the league has to offer. With both results coming away from home these will be four of the most psychologically important points the club may well win this season.

With such a small budget and as a consequence a small squad, Barnet have always struggled with consistency, and it is through collecting points against the top sides which can provide the belief within the team they can get results against any other side on any given day. After all, it took a managerial cameo from Martin ‘Mad Dog’ Allen at the death to provide Barnet with a similar boost last season.

Finally, as I suggested in my first article, Izale McLeod can be the difference between Barnet having a good or poor season. That he is joint leading the League 2 scoring table speaks volumes, not only about his ability, but about how important he is to Barnet’s prospects of grinding out wins. Relying upon such a player can be something of a double edged sword however and with success of any kind, there is always a counterbalance. These successes should not mask the fact that there have also been some disappointments in Barnet’s early season

The Bad:

Due to the size of the squad and the disproportionate effect that injuries can have on such a small group, without McLeod Barnet are simply not as good. Having failing to beat Accrington Stanley (who had two men dismissed, one in second half injury time) Barnet boss Lawrie Sanchez commented after the game upon the absence of McLeod, commenting that:

“We didn’t create and missing a player like Izale McLeod, you can’t not miss a player of that quality”, going on further to state, ”we haven’t got the biggest squad in the world and we had run out of ideas to be fair.”

I don’t wish to simply state the obvious – that without a very talented player the team are not as effective – but that they are so reliant upon his goals, Barnet can’t expect to compete without his presence. He has scored more goals than the club’s next four top scorers combined. Little wonder his is the first name on the team sheet I am looking for! If he is injured or leaves the club in January, based on the start to the season, the side would not be equipped to score goals on a regular basis.

Linked to the game against Accrington is the biggest concern Barnet are facing, from my point of view, which is their home form.

The statistics look better after last night’s 2-0 home victory over struggling Plymouth Argyle, but one home victory all season so far has been utterly frustrating, if understandable.

It is understandable on the basis that Barnet have a small squad, that they are inconsistent and that the only home defeat has come against third-placed Port Vale. The Bees are simply conceding too many goals at home and as a result, chasing games. Of course I am pleased that we are drawing games that we would have lost last season, but I feel that we could do better.

This why I feel that Barnet’s start to the season has been a good one. My concerns and criticisms are things that can be rectified as the campaign progresses and are an inevitable consequence of having a player of such calibre as McLeod, plus the almost unbearable optimism I felt when Barnet beat the League leaders away from home. Most results after that would have been something of a disappointment.

The Ugly:

As is tradition at the Underhill, away from points, performance and position, one subject looms large at the beginning of every season – the stadium.

Here is an official statement from the Barnet chairman Tony Kleanthous on the current state of affairs, and it doesn’t make for pretty reading.

I don’t have anything to add to the statement, save my hope that a resolution can be found that keeps Barnet within the borough.

Unfortunately for all those connected with Barnet, no matter how good our start to the season can be considered to be, this long running dispute continues to cast a long shadow over the future of Barnet football club.

Written by Hugh Webster – We Are Going Up’s Barnet Blogger

Hugh tweets at @hughwebster

A New Season: A New Hope?

Monday, July 25th, 2011

There is no doubt that here at Barnet we love a drama.” Tony Kleanthous, Barnet FC Chairman.

I suspect that if you were to ask any Barnet fan of their reaction to the dramatic (to say the least) climax of the 2010-11 League 2 season, two answers would predominate. It is these two themes which, I feel, neatly encapsulate not only Barnet’s aspirations for the upcoming season, but also what it has meant to be a Barnet fan in the last few seasons.

Déjà Vu

As last season drew to a close the feeling of déjà vu was palpable for a great many Barnet supporters, as memories were cast back to the preceding 2009-10 season.

After 13 games without a victory, including a particularly abject run of 5 straight defeats Barnet were in serious danger of relegation. This led to the sacking of Ian Hendon as manager and the return of Paul Fairclough as caretaker-manager for the final two games of the season.

Barnet were able to preserve their league status courtesy of a final day victory at home against Rochdale, in a game which finished 1-0.

Hopes that last season would be a little kinder to supporter’s blood pressure and fingernails were soon dashed. New manager Mark Stimson struggled to produce points or consistency of play, and was sacked by the club after 22 games, with Barnet languishing in the relegation zone (albeit on goal difference.)

By the time the last game of the season was upon us, Barnet had employed their 4th manager of the campaign in Guiliano Grazioli.

Preceding this was the surreal 3 match cameo-management of Martin Allen, which provided 7 invaluable points, and a very sour taste in the mouth when he joined Notts County with no prior warning or notice.

I really ought to point out at this juncture that, in my experience, as a supporter there is nothing more stressful than having your team’s league football status being decided on the last day of the season. This is exacerbated 10 fold when your future is not in your own hands. The situation was stark. Barnet needed a victory against Port Vale, who themselves had beaten Morecambe 7-2 the previous weekend, and Lincoln had to lose to Aldershot.

It is very difficult to express the emotions of the last day of the season. There was of course some relief that Barnet even had a chance of league survival. This was especially keenly felt because Barnet had overcome a 4 point and 6 match deficit to give themselves this opportunity.

Predominantly, however, there was immense fear and trepidation that we were in the relegation zone on merit, having generally played sloppy football all season, and that even a win might not be enough.

I shall not give a match report here (but the Guardian provided a fantastic picture gallery and match report of their own). I can say what I, and other Barnet fans were experiencing after those agonizing 6 minutes of stoppage time in the second half, which were Relief and euphoria.

Optimism

This brings me to the second theme of the last season and the upcoming campaign. I feel that there are genuine grounds for optimism.

This, I hasten to add, does not mean that I think that Barnet will be challenging for promotion, but it does mean that I think that Barnet supporters have reason to believe that we will not be involved in a relegation battle, for two key reasons.

The first and most important of these reasons is the appointment of the supremely qualified Lawrie Sanchez as manager. It became apparent under the (admittedly brief) tenure of Allen that Barnet had a squad that were capable of winning regularly, and more importantly, were difficult to beat.

Even a cursory look at Sanchez’ track record at Wycombe, Fulham and with Northern Ireland demonstrates a manager used to working with relatively few resources, and with particular reference to his stint with Northern Ireland, a manager who is capable of motivating his players to reach the upper limits of their potential.

To have a manager with Premier League and International experience at the helm is genuinely exciting.

The other reason pertains to the players, who for one reason or another, underachieved last season, but have much more to offer. Of these players none will have as great a say on Barnet’s fortunes in the upcoming season as Izale McLeod.

A former million pound striker and England U21 international, his career has stalled somewhat due to injuries, but undoubtedly has the potential to trouble any defence in the league when healthy. His current record of 14 goals in 29 games for Barnet (a goal every other game) is indicative of what he is capable of.

Coupled with Mark Hughes (a full international for Northern Ireland) and former youth internationals such as Liam O’Brien and Darren Dennehy, it is clear that this is a squad with more talent than it has been letting on.

One player which I expect to play significantly more in the upcoming season is Mauro Vilhete, a Portuguese forward who is Barnet’s record holder as their youngest ever football league player, and product of our ‘Hive’ youth facilities,.

He is a player with enormous potential, and has been called up to a training camp with the Portuguese U18 national team. I am sure that I speak for all Barnet supporters when I say that I am eager to watch him develop over the course of the next season.

Looking Forward:

So where does this leave us in terms of hopes and expectations for the 2011-12 season?

I honestly think that Barnet are well placed to comfortably avoid relegation and build for the future. Whilst the traumatic past couple of seasons are still fresh in the memory, the upcoming season does not fill me with trepidation, but with optimism.

With the new management team of Sanchez and Grazioli, the quality of the spine of the squad, and the potential of the ‘Hive’ producing more players on a regular basis as time passes, I would challenge any Barnet supporter not to look towards the future with a smile.

Written by Hugh Webster – We Are Going Up’s Barnet Blogger

Hugh tweets at @hughwebster